[beryl-dev] Fwd: Merge On - but why a _new_ name?
Francis Giannaros
francisg at gmail.com
Sun Mar 25 04:20:12 CEST 2007
I'm incredibly happy to hear about the merge.
However, I then see, in the same post:
> We do indeed need to choose a third, new name in a merge, and of course
> (again) rename the beryl-named components, for the obvious reasons.
...what? I don't see the obvious reasons; it seems to me as though such a
decision can only really be made for pride and/or psychological reasons, and
that worries me since I think that pride had its role to play in the original
split. I've also spoken to people in a few channels on IRC and they seem
equally baffled by such a decision.
Regards,
--
Francis Giannaros
Website: http://francis.giannaros.org
IRC: apokryphos on irc.freenode.net
More information about the beryl-dev
mailing list